JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 59 No. 10 1808-1816
© 1976 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keowin, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keowin, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Powell, R. L.

Effects of Selection Bias on Sire Evaluation Procedures

J. F. Keowin1, H. D. Norman and R. L. Powell

Animal Physiology and Genetics Institute, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705

ABSTRACT

Problems associated with selected records in methods of sire evaluation have been examined, and multiplicative factors for adjustment have been developed to incorporate later lactation records in sire evaluation procedures where a first record is missing. All Holstein records in the Dairy Herd Improvement Association files at Beltsville, Maryland, with freshening dates between 1960 and 1973 were used to quantify the amount of selection bias in later records that do not have first-lactation information available. Differences for lactation groupings show the amount of bias from selection in these records. The model included an overall mean, effects due to the herd-year-season of freshening, and opportunity groups that were formed depending on the number of later lactations for individual cows. These multiplicative factors can be used to adjust approximately 47% of cows in the files that do not have first-lactation information. These records can be incorporated, if needed to increase accuracy or increase comparisons, in the Best Linear Unbiased Prediction method or the Modified Contemporary Comparison method of sire evaluation.


FOOTNOTES

1 Sire Program Manager-Holstein, Eastern AI Coop., Box 518, Ithaca, NY 14850.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell, P. M. VanRaden, F. Miglior, and G. de Jong
Consistency of Maturity Rate for Milk Yield Across Countries and Generations
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3937 - 3944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. D. Norman, J. L. Hutchison, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, and T. J. Lawlor
Selection on Yield and Fitness Traits When Culling Holsteins During the First Three Lactations
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 1008 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell, and P. M. VanRaden
Impact of Maturity Rate of Daughters on Genetic Ranking of Holstein Bulls
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2005; 88(9): 3337 - 3345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.