JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 59 No. 10 1788-1793
© 1976 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Noller, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wheeler, W. E.
Right arrow Articles by Noller, C. H.

Limestone Buffers in Complete Mixed Rations for Dairy Cattle1

W. E. Wheeler2 and C. H. Noller

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN

ABSTRACT

In two feeding trials lactating dairy cows were fed limestone and in one trial growing dairy heifers were fed magnesium-limestone-buffered rations. Complete mixed rations based on corn silage and corn grain were fed ad libitum. In Trial 1, cows fed a ration with 2.76% limestone consumed 7.36% less dry matter of feed than cows fed a ration containing .11% added limestone, with no effect on milk production. In Trial II, cows fed a ration with 2.71% limestone had similar feed intakes and milk production but gained more weight than cows fed a ration with .01% limestone. Heifers fed a ration supplemented with magnesium limestone gained .49 kg more weight per day and made more efficient use of feed than heifers fed the nonsupplemented ration. Limestone increased fecal pH from 5.99 to 6.62 in Trial 1, 6.13 to 6.57 in Trial II and decreased loss of starch in feces. Magnesium limestone increased fecal pH from 6.37 to 6.76 and decreased starch in feces from 5.60 to 1.14%. In these trials both limestone and magnesium limestone increased fecal pH, reduced starch losses in the feces, and improved feed efficiency.


FOOTNOTES

1 Journal Paper No. 6227, Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 USDA, ARS, Nutrition Institute, Ruminant Nutrition Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1976 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.