JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 57 No. 2 205-211
© 1974 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holter, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Urban, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holter, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by Urban, W. E., Jr.

Corn Silage with Either Haycrop Silage or Hay for Lactating Cows1,2,

J. B. Holter, J. M. Leahey and W. E. Urban, Jr.

Department of Animal Sciences, New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, Durham 03824

ABSTRACT

Eight Holstein cows were assigned randomly to two forage treatment groups receiving urea-treated corn silage (.5% urea, 27% dry matter) plus either wilted, mixed grass silage (37% dry matter) or field-cured hay (same source, cut 12 days later). Corn silage and haycrop were fed in a 60:40 dry matter ratio. A 16% (as fed) crude protein concentrate was fed to appetite until peak of lactation and according to 1966 National Research Council energy standards thereafter. Energy and nitrogen balance and ration digestibility were determined during wk 6 and 21 postpartum. Haycrop silage was higher in crude protein and minerals and lower in fiber than was hay on a dry matter basis. Nutrient digestibility and partition of dietary gross energy and nitrogen were not affected significantly by forage treatment. Metabolizable energy per unit dietary gross energy or per unit of dry matter was the same for both forage treatments. Mean daily milk was 30 and 22 kg in wk 6 and 21. No forage treatment x stage of lactation interactions were significant.


FOOTNOTES

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station as Scientific Contribution 658.

2 Research was partially supported by a grant from Agway, Inc., Syracuse, N.Y. Technical assistance of H. H. Hayes and J. Tetherly is gratefully acknowledge.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1974 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.