|
|
||||||||
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50010
ABSTRACT
Nearly 7,000 first lactations of daughters of 90 sires 187 progeny test herds were used to compare estimators of sire merit. The standard model among the several contains fixed effects of herd-year-seasons and sire groups and random effects of error and sires within groups. The estimate of merit for a sire is the sum of the appropriate group and sire within group estimates from a generalized least squares solution. This approach accounts for sires of hedmates, considers the number of daughters and herdmates in each herd-year-season, and simultaneously regresses sire constants toward appropriate group means. Three definitions of groups, as well as a model not including groups, were compared with the conclusion that virtually any grouping is preferable to ignoring groups for sires in general. Two herdmate comparisons, Predicted Difference, and regressed-mean weighted difference were compared, and evaluations by the latter approach were more like those from standard method. Both herdmate comparisons ignore the merit of sires of herdmates. Neither this omission nor ignoring environmental correlation seriously altered evaluations of the majority of sires.
1 Journal Paper J-7790 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, IA, Project 1053 as a collaborator under the North Central Regional Project, NC-2, Improvement of Dairy Cattle Through Breeding.
2 Present address: Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |