JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 56 No. 8 1011-1016
© 1973 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradshaw, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Read, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bradshaw, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Read, R. B., Jr.

Mechanical Preparation of Pour Plates for Viable Bacterial Counts of Milk Samples

J. G. Bradshaw, D. W. Francis, J. T. Peeler, J. E. Leslie, R. M. Twedt and R. B. Read, Jr.

Food and Drug Administration, Division of Microbiology, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

ABSTRACT

A machine for making bacterial pour plates to determine the viable bacteria counts of milk samples has been developed. Samples are automatically placed on a turntable conveyor which advances the sample under an arm that dips a .01-ml capacity cylinder and a .001-ml capacity loop into the sample three times. then, a divided petri dish is positioned under the dinning arm the milk in the cylinder and loop is flushed with 3 ml of dilution water, agar is pumped into the dish, and the sample and dish are each atutomatically removed from the turntable. The agar is solidified by passing the dish over a cold plate. The machine plates five samples of milk per minute.

Twenty-six milk samples were compared by the standard plate count and machine plate cylinder techniques; 26 additional samples were tested by the standard plate count and machine plate loop methods. Criteria to compare the machine and standard plate methods included experimental error equal to or less than .005 in log10 units, average difference between geometric means less than 9% and interaction factor not to exceed .007 in log10 units. All criteria were satisfied by the mechanical cylinder and loop methods.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.