JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 56 No. 2 224-228
© 1973 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grieve, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Coppock, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Grieve, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by Coppock, C. E.

Sulfur Supplementation of Urea-containing Silages and Concentrates. II. Ration Digestibility, Nitrogen, and Sulfur Balances

D. G. Grieve1, W. G. Merrill and C. E. Coppock

Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850

ABSTRACT

Metabolism trials were conducted on 16 cows at three stages of lactation to evaluate effect of sulfur supplementation on utilization of urea in corn silage and concentrate portions of ration and on digestibility and nitrogen and sulfur balance. Treatments arranged in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial consisted of: .5% urea-treated or 3.5% soybean meal-treated corn silage; 0 or .8% urea-containing 18% crude protein concentrates; and 0 or .8% concentrate anhydrous sodium sulfate. Treatments did not affect digestibility of ration dry matter, cell walls, acid detergent fiber, or crude protein. Sulfur digestibility was improved by sulfur supplementation. Cows fed urea-treated corn silage had lower nitrogen balances ( — 14.0 vs. 4.2 grams per day) than cows fed soy-treated corn silage. Neither concentrate nitrogen source, sulfur supplementation, nor treatment interactions affected nitrogen utilization. Urea was better utilized when included in the concentrate rather than corn silage portion of the ration, and on a low sulfur ration sodium sulfate supplementation did not affect nitrogen utilization. Sulfur balances were not affected by treatments although absorbed sulfur and urinary sulfur were increased by sulfur supplementation.


FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.