JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 56 No. 10 1298-1304
© 1973 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moe, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hooven, N. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moe, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hooven, N. W., Jr.

Physical Form and Energy Value of Corn Grain

P. W. Moe1, H. F. Tyrell1 and N. W. Hooven, Jr.2

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland 20705

ABSTRACT

Sixteen energy balance trials with lactating Holstein cows were in each of two changeover experiments to test the effect of physical folm of corn grain on its energy value for lactation. In each experiment eight cows were paired on milk production. Pair mates were given equal amounts of diets containing 4058 long alfalfa hay as the sole forage. In the first experiment, diets containing 54.5% ground corn and 5.5% soybean meal had higher digestible, metabolizable, and net energy values than did a diet containing a sirnilar amount of whole corn. In a second experiment, diets containing 5.4% wheat bran, 5.4% molasses, 1.2% minerals, and 48% ground corn had higher digestible and metabolizable energy values than did the corresponding diet in which cracked corn was substituted for ground corn. The higher digestible energy value for the ground corn diet in both experiments was due largely to improved digestibility of cell solubles. The metabolizable energy of the ground corn diets was used less efficiently for milk production, however, and this may have been related to the lower fat content in milk produced on those diets. These data suggest caution in the use of energy values for feedstuffs without regard to the physical form of the grain and the nature of the product formed.


FOOTNOTES

1 ARS, Nutrition Institute, Ruminant Nutrition Laboratory.

2 ARS, Animal Physiology and Genetics Institute, Animal Operations Unit.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. L. Ellis, E. Kebreab, N. E. Odongo, B. W. McBride, E. K. Okine, and J. France
Prediction of Methane Production from Dairy and Beef Cattle
J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2007; 90(7): 3456 - 3466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Charbonneau, P. Y. Chouinard, G. Allard, H. Lapierre, and D. Pellerin
Milk from Forage as Affected by Rumen Degradable Protein and Corn Grinding When Feeding Corn- and Alfalfa Silage-Based Diets
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 823 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Charbonneau, P. Y. Chouinard, G. Allard, H. Lapierre, and D. Pellerin
Milk from Forage as Affected by Carbohydrate Source and Degradability with Alfalfa Silage-Based Diets
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 283 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1973 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.