JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 55 No. 8 1156-1159
© 1972 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dracy, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dracy, A. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bush, L. F.

Pressure Patterns in the Reticulum of the Cow1

A. E. Dracy, A. J. Kurtenbach and D. E. Sander

Electrical Engineering Department

L. F. Bush

Animal Science Department, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57006

ABSTRACT

Two mature holstein cows were used to ascertain reticular pressure patterns. A pressure-sensitive transmitter 2.54 cm in diameter and 20.32 cm long was passed down the esophagus to the reticulum. This transmitter sent a variable frequency signal which was decoded to indicate pressures from zero to 175 mm Hg. Continuous pressures were recorded. Rumination and nonrumination pressures were recorded and correlated to different activities such as standing, resting, drinking, and eating. The average length of contraction cycles was 42 sec in nonrumination whereas the average contraction cycle in rumination was 56 sec. Nonrumination patterns exhibited two pressure peaks per cycle whereas rumination had three peaks per cycle. The time interval between the first and second pressure peak of a cycle was approximately 3 sec in both rumination and nonrumination. In rumination the third pressure peak was approximately 3 sec after the second. Contraction pressure magnitudes varied with external activity of the cow. Peaks within each cycle were of different magnitude, usually the first peak was smaller than the secondin nonrumination. During rumination, peak averages were similar for the first two peaks but greater for the third.


FOOTNOTES

1 Published with approval of the Director as Paper 1088 Journal Series, South Dakota Agricultural Experiment Station, Brookings, South Dakota.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
U. Braun and S. Rauch
Ultrasonographic evaluation of reticular motility during rest, eating, rumination and stress in 30 healthy cows
Vet Rec., November 8, 2008; 163(19): 571 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
S. Seo, C. Lanzas, L. O. Tedeschi, and D. G. Fox
Development of a Mechanistic Model to Represent the Dynamics of Liquid Flow Out of the Rumen and to Predict the Rate of Passage of Liquid in Dairy Cattle
J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 840 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.