JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 55 No. 2 177-182
© 1972 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stroup, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Read, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stroup, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Read, R. B., Jr.

Temperature Variations in the Holding Tube During Ultra High-Temperature Pasteurization by Steam Injection

W. H. Stroup, R. W. Parker, R. W. Dickerson, Jr. and R. B. Read, Jr.

Division of Microbiology, Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

ABSTRACT

Temperature variations after steam injection were monitored at 10 positions along a 61-cm holding tube with highspeed thermocouples (thermometric lag of approximately 40 milliseconds). Three steam injectors were tested with water (tap and deacrated) and milk at from 880 to 1,330 liters per hour, temperature increases by steam injection from 22 to 33 C, holding temperatures from 88 to 110 C, and holding pressures from 1.2 to 3.0 atm (abs.). Skimmilk (9% and 42% solids), chocolate milk, cream, and ice cream mix were also studied under selected processing conditions. Temperatures varied greatly (±15 C) with water, milk, and skimmilk (42% solids) under some conditions; however, temperature variations at the injector exits (5 cm downstream) were eliminated when the following were imposed: a) all injector ports were orificed to isolate the product and steam flows from pressure fluctuations in the injection chamber, b) the process was as free as possible of noncondensable gases, and c) the holding pressure was at least 0.2 atm above the product saturation vapor pressure. Accordingly, temperature variations in the holding tube can be eliminated by adhering to these operating conditions.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1972 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.