JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 54 No. 4 553-564
© 1971 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Robb, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Robb, J.

Relationship of Body Composition to Energy Intake and Energetic Efficiency1

J. T. Reid and J. Robb2

Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850

ABSTRACT

In heifers of dairy breeds and ranging in age from 1 day to 14 months, weights of body protein and fat and the amount of body energy increased linearly with increasing empty-body weight. That the variation in the respective relationships is small is indicated by the r2 of 0.997, 0.961, and 0.985. The rate of change in body energy per kilogram of empty-body weight was 2.55 Meal. Although the data examined represent animals with a variety of nutritional histories, much further study is needed to determine the degree to which relationships between the body components and body weight will resist nutritional alteration.

In dairy cows 28 months to 15 years of age, relationships between body components and body weight were quite variable, reflecting the mobility of body fat, water, and protein. Although these relationships have no predictive value, they suggest general trends such as the overall rate of change of 4.38 Meal, of energy per kilogram of empty-body weight.

Composition and energy value of the body tissue gain or loss by cattle are variable. Energy equivalence values (Meal per kg) derived from various studies with cows range from 4.8 to 9.4 for body gain and from 6.3 to 7.9 for body loss. It appears possible that body tissue gain or loss could range from as much as 100% of water to about 90% of fat.

Increasing degrees of body fatness in ruminants are associated with decreasing intakes of feed. The mechanism by which fatness influences appetite is not known. However, it is possible that the accumulation of fat in the abdominal cavity, in a manner similar to that of the developing gravid uterus, might restrict gastrointestinal capacity to curtail appetite, especially when high-forage diets are ingested. Present information suggests that the intake of high-concentrate diets is regulated by other or additional means. It has been proposed that body fat depots of fat animals may release substances that depress appetite or that the adipose tissue of thin cows may utilize some unknown products of digestion at a greater rate than does the adipose tissue of fat cows to increase intake by thin cows.

In fat ruminants, digestibility of energy may be depressed at a lower intake of feed than it is in thin ones, as the level of intake increases. Whether the energy requirement for maintenance is influenced by body fatness in cattle is unsettled; in sheep, the maintenance requirement does not appear to be different for fat and thin animals. for body gain, the net utilization of the metabolizable energy ingested above maintenance appears unaffected by the degree of fatness in ruminants of the same sex. Additional study is needed to determine the effect of body fatness on the energy requirement of maintenance in cattle, especially in the lactating cow.


FOOTNOTES

1 Some of the authors' investigations reported here were supported by Research Grant AM-02889 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases, U.S. Public Health Service, Bethesda, Maryland.

2 Present address: Unilever Research Laboratory, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, England.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
U. J. Schroder and R. Staufenbiel
Invited Review: Methods to Determine Body Fat Reserves in the Dairy Cow with Special Regard to Ultrasonographic Measurement of Backfat Thickness
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2006; 89(1): 1 - 14.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1971 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.