HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Albright, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Albright, J. L.

Conclusions

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana 47907

ABSTRACT

Perhaps this Symposium can be concluded by stating that whether we like it or not, anytime we appear before a class or group we are rated or evaluated.

1.Self evaluation. Most individuals know when they have done a good job of lecturing. It may evolve to this statement, "To thine own self be true." If one is satisfied then generally speaking one's client is too. It would help, too, if students would occasionally cheer, applaud, stand or show some life at the end of a particularly good lecture. This is a great morale booster.

2.Students. Seniors should be interviewed by competent staff and administrators concerning the curriculum and improving instruction. All students deserve the right to evaluate all courses. These are rightful procedures. Some evaluation forms for colleges of agriculture have as few as a dozen questions and others have five times that number. In any event the evaluation forms should be collected by a student or faculty representative and delivered to the department chairman or his representative.