JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 52 No. 4 472-478
© 1969 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, S. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Carr, S. B.

Sulfur, Nitrogen, and Amino Acid Balance, and Digestibility of Low-Sulfur and Sulfur-Supplemented Diets Fed to Lactating Cows1

Don R. Jacobson, Bedjo Soewardi2, J. W. Barnett3, R. H. Hatton and S. B. Carr4

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506

ABSTRACT

Eight mature lactating Holstein cows were divided into two groups. The low-sulfur group received a concentrate mix containing 0.10% sulfur and the sulfur-supplemented group received the same concentrate mix containing 0.18% sulfur. Both groups were fed the same corn silage (0.09% sulfur, dry basis) and the respective concentrate mix ad libitum at a ratio of 6.3 to 1.0. Eighty per cent of the ad libitum intake was fed during the balance and digestibility trials. The low-sulfur group excreted significantly less sulfur in urine but not in feces or milk. All cows were in negative sulfur and nitrogen balance. The supplemental sulfur was inefficiently utilized, as indicated by the increased urinary excretion of sulfur and by no effect on sulfur balance. Apparently, inorganic sulfur only partially met the cow's total dietary sulfur requirement. Balance of amino acids was very similar for both groups. All animals were essentially in balance for methionine, cystine, and tyrosine, negative balance for glutamic acid and lysine, and in positive balance for histidine, arginine, aspartic acid, threonine, serine, glycine, alanine, valine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, and proline. There was a positive balance of both essential and nonessential amino acids as two separate groups.


FOOTNOTES

1 The investigation reported in this paper (Journal Article no. 67-5-117) is in connection with a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with approval of the Director. Many of the data are from a thesis submitted by Bedjo Soewardito the Graduate School of the University of Kentucky in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree, Master of Science in Agriculture.

2 Present address: Bogor, Indonesia.

3 Present address: U.S. Army.

4 Present address: Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1969 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.