JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 51 No. 8 1249-1252
© 1968 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Acord, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Little, C. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Acord, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Little, C. O.

Combinations of Nitrogen Sources for Starch Digestion by Mixed Rumen Bacteria1, 2,

C. R. Acord, G. E. Mitchell, Jr. and C. O. Little

Department of Animal Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of all two-way combinations of arginine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, lysine, methionine, proline, serine, and valine as nitrogen sources for in vitro starch digestion by mixed rumen bacteria has been compared with that of urea and individual amino acids. Three-way and four-way combinations of aspartic acid, glutamic acid, lysine, proline, serine, urea, and valine were also evaluated. Thirteen of the 28 pairs tested significantly increased starch digestion, but only aspartic acid and lysine, aspartic acid and valine, and valine and serine approached the effectiveness of urea. The responses to these pairs exceeded simple additive effects. All three-way and four-way combinations tested significantly (P<.01) increased digestion in at least one trial. The most effective combination tested was urea, valine, aspartic acid, and lysine. Increased starch digestion appeared to be closely associated with ammonia concentrations after four and eight hours.


FOOTNOTES

1 The investigation reported in this paper (no. 67-5-102) is in connction with a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with approval of the Director.

2 This investigation was supported in part by contract no. AHd2-39(c) with the Beef Cattle Research Branch, Animal Husbandry Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, USDA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.