JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 51 No. 3 373-377
© 1968 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mohrenweiser, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Donker, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mohrenweiser, H. W.
Right arrow Articles by Donker, J. D.

Forage Evaluation. III. Comparison of Several Methods of Evaluating Two Alfalfa Hays Fed to Lactating Cows1, 2,

H. W. Mohrenweiser3, 4, and J. D. Donker

Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul

ABSTRACT

Early-cut and late-cut alfalfa hays were fed as the only sources of energy to two groups of Holstein heifers throughout their first lactations. Various formulas based upon crude protein and fiber contents of the hays were applied to estimate total digestible nutrients (TDN). Estimated net energy (ENE) values were derived from TDN values. Intakes of energy based on these different values were compared to energy requirements from Morrison's ENE and the National Research Council TDN standards. There is evidence to suggest that low condition of animals consuming late-cut hay caused an over-estimation of maintenance requirements which, in turn, caused relative deviations to be different from those seen in the groups consuming early-cut hay. Considering all facts, the formulas of Meyer and Lofgreen (16) to estimate TDN and the formula of Moore et al. (18) for converting TDN values to ENE values yielded estimates of energy contents of the hays which gave the best concurrence between energy intakes and energy requirements. The ENE system was favored over the TDN system.


FOOTNOTES

1 Scientific Journal Series, Paper no. 6154. Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Supported in part by Public Health Service Grant no. 1-T1-GM-1401-01.

3 Data presented are based in part on a thesis by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Master of Science degree.

4 Present address: Department of Dairy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.