JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 51 No. 12 1946-1949
© 1968 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lister, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pigden, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lister, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Pigden, W. J.

Performance of Holstein-Friesian Steers Fed an All-Concentrate Ration Diluted with Ground Hay 1

E. E. Lister, D. P. Heaney and W. J. Pigden

Animal Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Canada

ABSTRACT

Thirty-six Holstein-Friesian steers (two pens of six animals each per treatment) were group fed a barley-based all-concentrate diet (C), Diet C diluted with 20% ground hay (D), or Diet C diluted with 40% ground hay (E) from an initial live weight of 200 kg to a final live weight of 385 kg. Average daily gain was significantly (P < .05) depressed by Diet E (0.99 vs. 1.13 and 1.12 ± 0.02 kg for E vs. C and D, respectively). Feed efficiency was significantly (P < .05) different among all diets (6.36, 7.30, and 8.82 ± 0.08 kg feed per kilogram gain for C, D, E, respectively). The digestibility of energy, determined with sheep, was significantly (P < .05) different among the three diets (77.2, 70.9, and 64.2 ± 1.3% for C, D, E, respectively). Based on these digestion coefficients, steers on Diet E consumed significantly (P < .05) more digestible energy per kilogram of weight gain than those on C or D (17.58, 18.70, and 21.31 ± 0.31 Meal for Diets C, D, E, respectively). Ration E produced a significantly (P < .05) higher yield of prime rib and lower yield of chuck (per cent of chilled carcass) than C or D (9.8, 27.1; 9.7, 26.7; 10.4 ± 0.11, 25.0 ± 0.34 for Diets C, D, E, respectively).


FOOTNOTES

1 Contribution no. 302, Animal Research Institute.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.