JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 51 No. 10 1633-1638
© 1968 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Villavicencio, E.
Right arrow Articles by Waters, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Villavicencio, E.
Right arrow Articles by Waters, W. H.

Comparison of Complete Feed Rations to a Conventional Ration for Lactating Cows1

E. Villavicencio2, L. L. Rusoff, R. E. Girouard3 and W. H. Waters

ABSTRACT

Sixteen high-producing Holstein cows were used in a 110-day continuous trial to compare the effect of feeding three complete feeds containing different sources of roughage (alfalfa, cottonseed hulls or native grass hay) with a conventional system of feeding roughage and concentrate separately on intake of feed, total digestible nutrients and digestible energy, milk yield and composition, gross feed conversions, body weight changes, digestibility of the rations and health of the animals. All rations contained 30% roughage and 70% concentrate, and were fed ad libitum.

The cows receiving the cottonseed hulls ration consumed significantly (P < .05) more feed than the other groups, but no differences were observed in TDN and DE intake for any of the rations. No significant differences were observed on milk production, FCM, or milk constituents; however, cows fed the native grass hay ration had a significantly (P < .05) higher SNF percentage. There were no significant differences in the gross feed efficiencies of the animals on any of the rations. No significant differences in body weight gains of the animals were obtained. There were significant (P < .05) differences in the TDN coefficients in the rations; the theoretical TDN values overestimated the actual TDN values, especially those of the rations containing cottonseed hulls and native grass hay. Some health problems such as foot rot, stiffness of the joints and mastitis were encountered in a few animals in this study.

FOOTNOTES

1 The data were taken from a portion of a thesis submitted by the author to the Graduate School of Louisiana State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Doctor of Philosophy degree.

2 Present address: Anderson, Clayton & Co., S. A. Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico.

3 Present address: Allied Mills, Inc., Research Div., Libertyville, Ill.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1968 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.