JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 50 No. 7 1164-1166
© 1967 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Butcher, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Butcher, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, R. H.

Selection of Samples Used to Derive the Prediction Equation for Estimating Protein Content by Orange-G Dye-Binding Procedures1

D. F. Butcher, S. J. Weese, R. O. Thomas and R. H. Thomas2

Department of Animal Industry and Veterinary Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown

ABSTRACT

Protein determinations from Orange-G dye by two spectrophotometers (Bausch and Lomb Type 33-29-40, Beckman Model DB) and nitrogen by micro-Kjeldahl were available on 1,378 monthly test-day samples of milk. These samples were collected for 20 months. The objective was to determine the best procedure for obtaining samples to estimate prediction equations for each month when micro-Kjeldahl determinations are not available on all milk samples. One sampling procedure involved the selection of six samples for each month completely at random, while the other involved dividing the data into high, middle, and low thirds according to their dye-binding readings and selecting two observations from each third for each month.

Considerable variability was present in the magnitude of the correlations between the Kjeldahl and dye-binding estimates of per cent protein by both systems of sampling, indicating that six observations for each month were not sufficient to establish the monthly prediction equations.


FOOTNOTES

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station as Scientific Paper no. 921. Supported in part by regional research fund.

2 Chemistry Department, Wisconsin State University, Eau Claire.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.