HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Swanson, E. W. Articles by Miles, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Swanson, E. W. Articles by Miles, J. T.

Full Lactation Response on Restricted vs. ad Libitum Roughage Diets with Liberal Concentrate Feeding

Department of Dairying, University of Tennessee, Knoxville

ABSTRACT

The effect of replacing one-half of the expected roughage consumption with equivalent TDN from concentrates was determined in full lactations with 20 pairs of high producing cows. Control cows (Group I) were fed alfalfa hay and corn silage ad libitum plus concentrates at an average ratio to FCM of 1:2.4. Paired cows restricted on roughage (Group II) were allowed roughage at the rate of 3.0 kg hay and 7.5 kg silage per 500 kg body weight plus 3.8 kg concentrates, in addition to the concentrate allowance for FCM at 1:2.4. In 294-day lactations Group I averaged 6,349 kg FCM and Group II, 6,137 kg, a nonsignificant difference (P > .10). Fat tests averaged 4.01 (I) and 3.89% (II), with the difference between groups from the 12th to the 22nd wk statistically significant (P < .01). Differences in body weight gain, total dry matter consumption, estimated TDN consumption, solids-not-fat tests, and milk fat yield were not significant. The average TDN/FCM ratio was significantly (P < .05) higher for Group II, 0.33, than for Group I, 0.31. Indications were that the Group II diet, which averaged 67.6% concentrate, was used less efficiently than the Group I diet, which averaged 51.1% concentrate. Restricting roughage and substituting concentrate for roughage TDN for cows fed concentrates liberally gave no benefits and resulted in lower milk fat tests and efficiency.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. Martin and D. Sauvant Metaanalysis of Input/Output Kinetics in Lactating Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2002; 85(12): 3363 - 3381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]