JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 50 No. 5 700-704
© 1967 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stull, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Stull, J. W.

Comparison of Milo and Barley for Lactating Cows. II. Effects of Roughage Intake and Season1

W. H. Brown, A. O. Jareed2 and J. W. Stull

Department of Dairy Science, The University of Arizona, Tucson

ABSTRACT

The feeding value was determined for two ratios of milo and barley (1:3 and 3:1), two levels of roughage intake (40 and 60% of ration by weight), and two seasons of the year (summer and winter) for lactating dairy cows. The milo-barley mixtures, along with molasses and cottonseed meal, were fed in pelleted form, while the roughage was good-quality alfalfa hay. All rations were fed individually to each animal, so that total feed consumption equalled 110% of Morrison's feeding standard for maintenance and production.

Production and gross composition of milk, component fatty acids of the milk fat, feed conversions, and rumen volatile fatty acids (VFA) were determined. The following conclusions were drawn: a) No differences were noted in the ability of milo or barley to support milk production, b) The pelleted milo and barley were equally palatable, c) High environmental temperature caused greater variability of all factors studied than did the lower temperatures, d) Per cent milk fat was depressed during the summer, e) While per cent fat appeared to be depressed by high concentrate, the depression was not statistically significant, f) Low roughage caused increased propionate and decreased acetate levels in the rumen during summer, g) High concentrate-high barley resulted in increased body weight gains, h) Barley caused increases in feed conversion, i) High evironmental temperatures caused a depression of the short-chain fatty acids of the milk fat.


FOOTNOTES

1 Arizona Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Paper no. 1181.

2 Present address: Ministry of Agriculture, Tripoli, Libya.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.