HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Colovos, N. F. Articles by Urban, W. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Colovos, N. F. Articles by Urban, W. E., Jr.

Urea for Lactating Dairy Cattle. II. Effect of Various Levels of Concentrate Urea on Nutritive Value of the Ration^{1, 2,}

Departments of Animal Sciences and Biochemistry, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of New Hampshire, Durham

ABSTRACT

The objective of the experiment was to determine the effect of several levels of concentrate urea on ration utilization in lactating cattle. A High-quality concentrate mixture containing 0, 1.25, 2.0, or 2.5% urea (42% N) in place of an equivalent amount of plant protein nitrogen was fed with good-quality timothy hay to Holstein cows during early lactation. Concentrate was fed according to milk production, and hay was limited to 2% of body weight daily. Sixteen digestibility trials, including energy and nitrogen balances and rumen metabolite analyses, were conducted.

Ration intake was high on all treatments. There were no significant treatment differences in milk production or composition, or in ration digestibility. Nutritive value, expressed as digestible or metabolizable energy per unit dry matter, was significantly depressed at the two highest urea levels. Molar proportions of acetic, propionic, and butyric acids in rumen fluid at intervals before and after feeding were Unaffected by treatments. Rumen fluid urea levels were very low, even 0.5 hr post-feeding. Rumen fluid ammonia concentration rose markedly after feeding in response to the treatments, but the differences were not statistically significant.

¹ Published with the approval of the Director of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station as Scientific Contribution no. 402.

² This research was partially supported by a grant from the E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Delaware.