HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Colovos, N. F. Articles by Urban, W. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Colovos, N. F. Articles by Urban, W. E., Jr.

Urea for Lactating Dairy Cattle. I. Effect of Concentrate Fiber and Urea Levels on Nutritive Value of the Ration^{1, 2,}

Departments of Animal Sciences and Biochemistry, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of New Hampshire, Durham

ABSTRACT

Sixteen individual digestion balances were carried out, using four Holstein cows in the second through fifth months of their first lactation, to study the effect of concentrate fiber and urea on ration utilization and production. Body weights of the four animals at the beginnnig of the experiment ranged from 400 to 500 kg and daily milk production was between 20 and 23 kg. Concentrate mixtures containing corn meal, oat mill feed, crimped oats, wheat bran, corn gluten feed, brewer's grains, molasses, soybean oil meal, and minerals were fed according to milk production. Levels of urea (42% N) in the concentrate mixtures were 0 and 2%, and the levels of fiber were 5 and 8%. Fair-quality timothy hay was fed as the only forage at the rate of 2% of body weight. Generally speaking, only minor changes occurred in ration intake, protein digestibility, milk production, blood and rumen metabolite concentrations. Urea significantly improved digestibility of fiber in the ration when included in the low-fiber concentrate mixture and had the opposite effect in the high-fiber concentrate. Otherwise, the higher levels of concentrate fiber and urea significantly depressed ration digestibility and nutritive value, the fiber causing a much more pronounced effect.

¹ Published with the approval of the Director of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station as Scientific Contribution no. 399.

² This research was partially supported by a grant from the E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Delaware.