JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 50 No. 12 1991-1993
© 1967 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCaskey, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Liska, B. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCaskey, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Liska, B. J.

Effect of Milk Processing Methods on Endosulfan, Endosulfan Sulfate, and Chlordane Residues in Milk

T. A. McCaskey1 and B. J. Liska

Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana

ABSTRACT

Samples of milk containing endosulfan, endosulfan sulfate, or chlordane were manufactured into condensed, dried whole, and evaporated milk. The greatest loss of insecticide occurred during the manufacture of drum-dried milk. Endosulfan and endosulfan sulfate found in drum-dried milk represented a 49.7 and 70.4% decrease, respectively, of the amounts found in raw milk. The average per cent decrease of chlordane during the roller drying process was 44.9%. Chlordane was more stable to the milk-processing treatments than endosulfan or endosulfan sulfate.


FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Department of Dairy Science, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.