JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 50 No. 12 1985-1988
© 1967 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yaguchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tarassuk, N. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yaguchi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Tarassuk, N. P.

Gel Filtration of Acid Casein and Skimmilk on Sephadex1, 2,

Makoto Yaguchi and N. P. Tarassuk

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis

ABSTRACT

The calcium caseinate-phosphate complex of milk exists as micelles which vary in size. The molecular weight of the micelles is of the order of millions, and it has been reported that they are excluded from Sephadex G-100 (1, 4). On the other hand, the molecular weights of monomeric casein components are relatively small (2, 8), and they can be expected to penetrate into the gel matrix of both Sephadex G-200 and G-100. The casein components are aggregated at neutral pH and room temperature and they tend to form various complexes with each other. These aggregates and complexes are dissociated into smaller units, probably monomers, under certain conditions such as the presence of urea, extremes of pH, and low temperature (3, 6, 9). Although the behavior of {kappa}-casein on gel filtration has been reported (5), the fractionation of whole casein on Sephadex has not been studied. Such a study, together with the behavior of a sample of skimmilk on Sephadex gel, is the subject of the present communication.


FOOTNOTES

1 This investigation was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Research Grant EF-00424 from the Division of Environmental Engineering and Food Protection.

2 Presented at the annual meeting of the American Dairy Science Association at Lexington, Kentucky, 1965.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1967 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.