JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 49 No. 6 601-607
© 1966 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R. F.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, D. F.

Amino Acid Composition of Six Distinct Types of ß-Casein

R. F. Peterson, L. W. Nauman and D. F. Hamilton

Eastern Regional Research Laboratory, Eastern Utilization Research and Development Division, ARS, USDA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

ABSTRACT

Aschaffenburg classified ß-caseins into three groups—A, B, and C—based on their mobilities at pH 7.15 in paper electrophoresis with a citrate-phosphate buffer-containing urea. A study of the high-voltage electrophoresis diagrams of tryptic hydrolysates of a large number of ß-caseins of Type A showed four distinct and different patterns. When representatives of these four types were purified by chromatography and analyzed for their amino acid composition, differences were found in histidine, proline, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, alanine, serine, valine, isoleucine, and leucine. Considering only the variation in charge-bearing groups, the four ß-caseins, on the basis of five glycines per molecule, might be abbreviated as: A1(His6Asp9Glu40), A2-1 (His5Asp10Glu39), A2-2 (His5Asp10Glu38), and A2-3(His5Asp9Glu38). When the ß-caseins were typed in 7% acrylamide gel at pH 9 by our usual procedure, no difference in mobility could be detected. However, if the acrylamide was increased to 10% in the gels, A2-1(His5Asp10Glu39) was faster and A2-2(His5Asp10Glu38) slower than the two other types. The majority of the ß-casein 1 A samples typed agreed with A1(His6Asp9Glu40) and A2-3(His5Asp9Glu38) in mobility in the 10% gels. If the electrophoresis was in pH 3 acrylamide gels, the last two variants were easily distinguished, since the three A(His5) variants ran with the same mobility, but the A(His6) variant had a higher mobility. Thus, the four types can be distinguished by gel electrophoresis alone. An analysis of ß-caseins B and C is included for comparison. The ß-casein C was isolated by chromatography from an A/C ß-casein. The A and C analyses were identical, except for addition of one histidine and one lysine and subtraction of two prolines in the ß-casein C. ß-Caseins B are distinguished by the presence of five arginines; A and C have only four. (B and C have both 6-histidines.)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.