JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 49 No. 1 1-6
© 1966 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pangborn, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunkley, W. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pangborn, R. M.
Right arrow Articles by Dunkley, W. L.

Sensory Discrimination of Milk Salts, Lactose, Nondialyzable Constituents, and Algin Gum in Milk

R. M. Pangborn and W. L. Dunkley

Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis

ABSTRACT

A dual-standard, paired-comparison method was used by a trained panel to detect additions to milk of lactose, a milk salt mixture, a concentrate of nondialyzable constituents (NDC, mainly protein), and algin gum. To compare the additives on an equivalent basis, concentrations that could be detected two times out of three, as estimated by interpolation, were used. These values were milk salts, 0.03% in skimmilk (8.5 and 10.0% SNF) and 0.05% in milk with 2.0 and 3.5%, fat; lactose, 0.33%,; and NDC, 2.5% (2.2% protein). Criteria used most frequently to distinguish samples containing the additives were for milk salts, saltiness, tactile properties, and taste (quality unspecified); for lactose, sweetness and aftertaste; and for NDC, richness and tactile properties. In milks to which algin gum was added to increase viscosity, two-thirds correct response was obtained with 1.3 cp difference in whole milks (3.5% fat, and both 8.5 and 10.0%, SNF) and 2.3 cp difference in skimmilk. In comparing milk containing 2.0% fat with milk containing 3.5% fat, increasing the viscosity of the 2.0% milk (by adding gum) to equal that of the 3.5% milk did not influence detection of the difference in concentration of fat. Apparently, viscosity was not an important factor in this discrimination.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1966 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.