JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 48 No. 11 1473-1480
© 1965 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waldo, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Waldo, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Moore, L. A.

Ruminant Utilization of Silage in Relation to Hay, Pellets, and Hay Plus Grain. II. Rumen Content, Dry Matter Passage, and Water Intake

D. E. Waldo, E. W. Miller, M. Okamoto and L. A. Moore

Animal Husbandry Research Division, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland.

ABSTRACT

Two 4 x 4 Latin-square experiments were conducted using fistulated Holstein heifers. Experiment 1 compared silage, hay, pelleted hay, and hay plus grain. Experiment 2 compared direct-cut silage and hay harvested from the same source. The wet rumen contents and dry matter percentages were determined by completely emptying the reticulorumen of each animal on each ration at four times between 12-hr feeding intervals. From these data dry rumen contents were calculated. The dry rumen content was divided by the daily dry matter consumption to obtain an average retention time.

The wet and dry rumen contents of heifers when fed silage ad libitum were less than when fed hay, suggesting that silage intake was not restricted by rumen capacity. The retention time of silage was comparable to that of hay. The calculated daily fecal DM excretion relative to body weight was less for silage-fed animals than for hay-fed animals in a simultaneous growth trial, suggesting that silage intake was not limited by feed residues in the lower tract.

The undigested residue in the rumen calculated from the passage of stained particles using first-order equations showed no consistent relation to the actual amount present. The difference was caused by the variable portion undergoing digestion.

The animals drank less water when eating silage as compared to hay, but the total water intake per kilogram feed DM was greater on silage than on hay rations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
G. I. Zanton and A. J. Heinrichs
Rumen Digestion and Nutritional Efficiency of Dairy Heifers Limit-Fed a High Forage Ration to Four Levels of Dry Matter Intake
J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2008; 91(9): 3579 - 3588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1965 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.