HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baumgardt, B. R. Articles by Oh, H. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Baumgardt, B. R. Articles by Oh, H. K.

Evaluation of Forages in the Laboratory. IV. Within and among Trial Variability of the Wisconsin Artificial Rumen Procedure^1,2,

Department of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin, Madison

ABSTRACT

Within and among trial variability of an artificial rumen procedure used for forage evaluation were estimated. Comparison of forages ground through a 40- or 60-mesh screen revealed that finer grinding increased in vitro digestibility of grasses and legumes but the digestibility of grasses was increased to a greater extent. No significant difference was found in the correlation of in vitro cellulose digestion and in vivo DDM due to fineness of grind. It was suggested that grinding be standardized within a laboratory.

Fermentation periods of 18, 24, 30, and 48 hr all resulted in cellulose digestibilities significantly correlated with in vivo DDM. The correlation coefficients did not differ significantly. Day-to-day variation was significantly less for the 48-hr fermentation than for any of the shorter times.

Alternate procedures involving either a flask or a beaker as the fermentation vessel did not yield different within or among trial variances. The beaker method has the advantage of eliminating transfers.

The over-all variance and coefficient of variation of the Wisconsin artificial rumen procedure were 2.74 and 3.54% within day and 1.48 and 1.92% among days, respectively.

¹ Published with the approval of the Director of the Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station.

² This work was supported in part by the Research Committee of the Graduate School from funds supplied by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and in part by funds allocated to the Station on the recommendation of the North Central Technical Committee on The Development and Application of Laboratory Methods for Determining Forage Quality (NC-64).