JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 46 No. 5 411-415
© 1963 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wiseman, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gordon, C. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wiseman, H. G.

Feeding Value of Low-Moisture Alfalfa Silage from Conventional Silos

C. H. Gordon, J. C. Derbyshire, W. C. Jacobson and H. G. Wiseman

Dairy Cattle Research Branch, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland

ABSTRACT

The feeding value of low-moisture alfalfa silage from conventional tower silos was compared to the same crop preserved as high-quality hay. Silage or hay was fed ad lib as the only forage to dairy cattle or heifers in four feeding trials. Average daily forage dry matter intakes by dairy cows were 24.3 vs. 23.0 and 24.6 vs. 25.1 lb for low-moisture silage and hay, respectively. The corresponding values for FCM production were 23.4 vs. 22.5 and 33.5 vs. 32.8 lb. Heifers consumed similar amounts of low-moisture silage and hay dry matter per day (16.5 vs. 17.1 and 21.3 vs. 21.5 lb, respectively) and made similar liveweight gains (.93 vs. .71 and 1.71 vs. 1.62 lb). Analysis of variance indicated no significant differences in these means at a 5% probability level.

Proximate composition of the two forage types showed a consistent tendency for higher crude protein and lower crude fiber in the low-moisture silages compared to the matched hays. These silages were characterized by low contents of ammoniacal nitrogen and total acid, with a predominance of lactic acid and more than 2% reducing sugars. This indicated excellent preservation and limited fermentation. Higher digestibility of silage was observed in one of the two years.

It was concluded that replacement of field curing with low-moisture ensiling would be advantageous in many instances, since this would permit greater independence from weather and full automation of harvesting and feeding, with no sacrifice in feeding value.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.