JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 46 No. 11 1260-1265
© 1963 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brundage, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Branton, C. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brundage, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Branton, C. I.

Grasses and Alfalfa for Annual Forage and Pasture in South Central Alaska1

A. L. Brundage, W. J. Sweetman, L. J. Klebesadel, N. E. Michaelson and C. I. Branton

Alaska Agricultural Experiment Station, Palmer

ABSTRACT

Four grasses: common ryegrass (predominantly Lolium multiflorum), orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata), timothy (Phleum pratense), and tall oat-grass (Arrhenatherum elatius) were sown both in pure stands and in association with alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in 1961 and 1962. They were managed as annual forage crops and compared for herbage production and palatability to grazing dairy cows.

Ryegrass, either alone or with alfalfa, was superior in yield (P < 0.01), with alfalfa contributing little to the mixture. Yields were not significantly different (P < 0.01) from ryegrass-alfalfa and orchardgrass-alfalfa in 1961. Production from the other plots, including orchardgrass-alfalfa, was statistically homogeneous (P < 0.01).

Tall oatgrass ranked highest in palatability in 1961 (P < 0.01). Ryegrass was least palatable, with considerable statistical homogeneity among treatments ranking below tall oatgrass. In 1962, however, ryegrass was comparatively acceptable and no statistical differences among treatments were noted.


FOOTNOTES

1 Research supported in part by the tropical and subarctic Research Programs, Crops Research Division, ARS, USDA.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.