JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 46 No. 10 1054-1058
© 1963 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sather, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tamsma, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sather, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Tamsma, A.

Relation of Preference Panel and Trained Panel Scores on Dry Whole Milk1

Lois A. Sather and L. D. Calvin

Department of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis

A. Tamsma

Dairy Products Laboratory, Eastern Utilization Research and Development Division, USDA Washington, D. C.

ABSTRACT

Dry whole milk samples manufactured by the EURDD Dairy Products Laboratory, Washington, D. C., were scored by an Oregon State University trained panel, EURDD Dairy Products Laboratory, Washington, D. C., trained panel, EURDD Engineering and Development Laboratory, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania, trained panel, and by an OSU preference panel of from 100 to 160 student judges. After preliminary testing of 63 samples by the DPL and OSU panels, two series of 50 samples each for a total of 100 samples were tested by all four panels, except the Wyndmoor panel, which tested only 96 samples.

Two of the three trained panels used modifications of the American Dairy Science Association score-card for dry whole milk. The Oregon trained panel used a simple six-factor ballot. The student preference panel scored the samples on the nine-point hedonic scale.

All data were statistically analyzed for correlation and regression coefficients. Results indicated that total scores from the trained panels could be used as a basis for a scoring system which would predict consumer preference scores. The trained panels' scores for individual scoring factors, i.e., cooked, oxidized, stale, astringent flavors, did not satisfactorily predict preference scores, but could be used as an indication of possible flavor defects in dry whole milk samples.


FOOTNOTES

1 Technical Paper No. 1672, Oregon Agricultural Experiment Station.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.