JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 46 No. 10 1025-1032
© 1963 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schafer, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schafer, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, J. E.

Rapid Screening Method for DDT in Milk with Gas Chromatography

M. L. Schafer, K. A. Busch and J. E. Campbell

Milk and Pood Research, Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, Public Health Service, Cincinnati, Ohio

ABSTRACT

A method is presented for the assay of DDT and DDE. Milk is hydrolyzed with alcoholic KOH and extracted once with hexane. A 50-µl portion of extract, equivalent to 50 mg milk, is injected into a chromatograph having an electron affinity detector (tritium). The column consists of two aluminum segments, a 6-in. and a 6-ft length, 1/4 in. od, packed with CaC2 (20/30 mesh) and Fluoropak 80 coated with Silicon Dow 11 and Epon Resin 1001. For our work, the temperature of oven housing column and detector was 200 C and the flow rate of carrier gas, nitrogen, was 210 ml/min. Calibration curves were prepared by plotting peak heights against known concentrations of DDE and used for computing unknown concentrations in milk. An average recovery of 95 ± 7.7% was obtained when either p,p'-DDT or DDE was added to milk at 0.04 to 0.12 ppm. The standard deviations in all recovery studies were homogeneous, with a value of ± 0.107 cm peak height or ± 0.003 ppm DDE. Comparison of the results obtained on split milk samples by this technique and by paper chromatography showed no significant differences. The method is simple and accurate. In one workday 20 to 25 samples can be analyzed by one technician with one instrument.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1963 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.