JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 45 No. 2 250-252
© 1962 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Davis, R. R.

Relationship of in Vitro Cellulose Digestibility of Undried and Dried Mixed Forages to Their in Vivo Dry Matter Digestibility1, 2,

R. R. Johnson, B. A. Dehority, H. R. Conrad and R. R. Davis

Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, Wooster, Ohio

ABSTRACT

During the study of the value of the in vitro rumen fermentation technique for estimating the nutritive value of forages, it became of interest to compare the digestibility of the cellulose in forages in the undried and dried state. For this technique to be of use in studying the nutritive value of undried forages such as soilage and pasture, the samples used for in vitro trials should possess the same digestibility characteristics as the samples being consumed by the animals. Consequently, it was necessary to determine the effect of ordinary sample-drying techniques on the digestibility of cellulose in forages.

Samples for this comparison were available from another experiment in which three methods of utilizing a mixed forage (alfalfa-bromegrass) were being compared using dairy cows. The comparison involved both milk production studies and digestibility determinations, using the chromic oxide and plant chromogen techniques. The three systems of using the forage were green-chopped forage fed twice a day (A and F); six-paddock rotational grazing (B and I) and daily rotational or strip grazing (C and E).


FOOTNOTES

1 Approved for publication as Journal Article No. 111-61 by the Associate Director of the Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station, Wooster.

2 The authors wish to acknowledge assistance of Mr. H. W. Scott and Miss R. A. Forestal during the conductance of these experiments, and the assistance in the statistical analyses by Dr. G. E. Weaver.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1962 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.