JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 44 No. 5 879-887
© 1961 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, F. N.
Right arrow Articles by Touchberry, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dickinson, F. N.
Right arrow Articles by Touchberry, R. W.

Livability of Purebred vs. Crossbred Dairy Cattle1

F. N. Dickinson

Dairy Husbandman, Agricultural Research Service, USDA

R. W. Touchberry

Department of Dairy Science, University of Illinois, Urbana

ABSTRACT

The data for this study were obtained from the Illinois Dairy Cattle Crossbreeding Project. Only those causes of death were included in the analysis which were considered to reflect on the viability, or to show a possible sign of weakness of a breed group. Deaths due to ingesting hardware and poisoning were excluded. Significant differences in livability between the purebreds and the crossbreds or 3/4-breds were found in first-generation heifers from birth to 1 yr. of age and cows over all lactations, and in second-generation heifers from birth to 1 yr. of age and from birth to calving age. In each of these cases, over twice as many purebreds were lost from the herds as crossbreds or criss-crosses. The over-all death losses in both generations were 32.7% for purebreds and 13.4% for the crossbreds and 3/4-breds. The mean milk production of the live vs. dead cows in each breed group of the first generation was analyzed by the method of least squares. A small and nonsignificant difference was found between the production of the live and dead animals when considered over all animals regardless of breed, by breed of sire, by breed of dam, or by system of mating (purebreeding vs. crossbreeding). This indicates that there is little genetic relationship between livability and productive level and emphasizes the importance of improving the livability characteristics of dairy animals, so that more discretion can be exercised by the dairyman in culling cows. Most studies have indicated only a small or no influence of additive genetic variation on livability characteristics and, therefore, little chance of improving these characteristics by mass selection. However, this study indicates a considerable influence of nonadditive genetic factors, or heterosis, on livability and that crossbreeding dairy cattle may provide a means for immediate and marked improvement.


FOOTNOTES

1 The data for this study were taken from the Dairy Cattle Crossbreeding Project being conducted at the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station. This project is a cooperative project between the Dairy Cattle Research Branch of the ARS, USDA, and the Department of Dairy Science of the University of Illinois, and is a contributing project to Regional Project NC-2, The Improvement of Dairy Cattle Through Breeding.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
B. J. Heins, L. B. Hansen, and A. J. Seykora
Fertility and Survival of Pure Holsteins Versus Crossbreds of Holstein with Normande, Montbeliarde, and Scandinavian Red
J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2006; 89(12): 4944 - 4951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.