JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 44 No. 4 672-678
© 1961 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holtz, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holtz, E. W.
Right arrow Articles by Hodgson, A. S.

Relationship Between Rate of Gain from Birth to Six Months of Age and Subsequent Yields of Dairy Cows1

E. W. Holtz2, R. E. Erb and A. S. Hodgson

Department of Dairy Science, Washington State University, Pullman and Puyallup

ABSTRACT

Three breeds of experiment station cows (WSU Guernseys, Jerseys, and Holsteins, and WWES Holsteins) were used to determine if average daily gain (pounds) from birth to 6 mo. of age was related to later 305-day lactation yields of 4% fat-corrected milk (FCM). Feeding and management of the cows and calves was above-average. The 200 calves gained an average of 1.34 lb. daily and they subsequently produced an average of 10,544 lb. FCM per lactation. Comparing FCM yield by (a) simple averages or as (b) mature equivalent (ME) with average daily gain, without regard to breed, gave correlations and regressions misleadingly high. When yields were expressed in terms of (c) FCM/1,000 lb. of cow, (d) relative lactation capacity (Kleiber and Mead, J. Dairy Sci., 28:49.1945), or (e) gross efficiency (Gaines, Science, 67:353.1928), gain and subsequent yield were negatively correlated. The slower-gaining WSU Jerseys produced significantly better than the faster-gaining ones as judged by any of the five measures of producing ability mentioned above. In contrast, the faster-gaining WSU Holsteins produced the best (P < 0.05) for FCM and mature equivalent FCM. The WSU Jerseys and WSU Holsteins were significantly different with respect to gain and subsequent production for each of the five measures [(a)–(e)] of producing ability. Similarly, WSU Guernseys and WWES Holsteins showed no significant relationships between gain and subsequent yield. On an intra-herd and intra-breed basis the linear correlation and regression coefficients between gain and yield were significant only for FCM and MEFCM and these were of a low order (r = 0.14 and 0.15, respectively). Judging from the results of this study, it is unlikely that gain can be used to predict producing ability.


FOOTNOTES

1 Scientific Paper No. 1955, Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, Project 1106.

2 Present address: Topper Feed Mills, Fresno, California.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.