JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 44 No. 1 174-175
© 1961 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claypool, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wiseman, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Claypool, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wiseman, R. F.

A Simplified Method of Obtaining Differential and Total Viable Anaerobic Counts of Rumen Bacteria Employing Sealed Small-Diameter Glass Tubing1

D. W. Claypool, Don R. Jacobson and Ralph F. Wiseman

Departments of Dairy Science and Microbiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington

ABSTRACT

Two major obstacles encountered when attempting to culture rumen bacteria are the difficulty in maintaining anaerobic conditions throughout, and the limited number of samples which can be handled within a reasonable length of time. Sections of small glass tubing (4 mm. outside diameter, cut into 12-in. lengths) are employed in much the same way as are Burri tubes, in an effort to overcome these obstacles. These hold 1 ml. of culture medium and allow about 2 in. of gas space at both ends of the column of medium.

The glass tubing sections are placed in a canister and sterilized in an autoclave before use. A 2-ml. sterile hypodermic syringe, fitted with a sterilized rubber adapter, is used to pull the medium into the tubing. The syringe is first filled with CO2 gas and then fitted to one end of a section of glass tubing. The other end of the tubing is inserted in the mouth of a test tube containing medium with the desired dilution of whole rumen content, and the CO2 in the syringe is exhausted through the tubing to remove all air.


FOOTNOTES

1 The investigation reported in this paper is in connection with a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the Director.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1961 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.