JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 42 No. 1 89-93
© 1959 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Dell, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Flipse, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by O'Dell, W. T.
Right arrow Articles by Flipse, R. J.

Metabolism of Bovine Semen. VI. Effect of Fructose and Arabinose on the Uptake and Metabolic Utilization of Glycerol-1-C14 by Bovine Spermatozoa1, 2,

W. T. O'Dell3, J. O. Almquist and R. J. Flipse

Dairy Breeding Research Center, Department of Dairy Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

ABSTRACT

The addition of 1.25% fructose to a saline—1% glycerol diluent resulted in less glycerol-1-C14 utilization by twice-washed bull spermatozoa than when fructose was omitted. Arabinose reduced glycerol utilization slightly. Significant quantities of fructose and arabinose disappeared during incubation of spermatozoa under nitrogen for 3 hr. at 37° C. No lactic acid was produced from arabinose, whereas fructose utilization resulted in the production of large amounts of lactate. Glycerol reduced anaerobic glycolysis of bull spermatozoa. Less sugar was utilized when 1% glycerol was added to saline, saline-fructose, and saline-arabinose diluents than when glycerol was omitted. Glycerol addition resulted in greater lactic acid production in saline and saline-arabinose diluents. However, in saline-fructose diluent less lactate accumulated when glycerol was added.


FOOTNOTES

1 Authorized for publication on August 1, 1958 as paper No. 2280 in the journal series of The Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station.

2 Supported in part by grants from the Pennsylvania State Association of Artificial Breeding Cooperatives.

3 The data contained in this paper are part of a thesis submitted by the senior author to the Graduate School of The Pennsylvania State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1959 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.