JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 41 No. 7 956-962
© 1958 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richards, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Richards, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, J. D.

Comparison of Methoxyl, Lignin, Crude Fiber, and Crude Protein Contents of Forage and Feces as Indirect Indicators of Dry Matter Digestibility1

C. R. Richards, H. G. Weaver2 and J. D. Connolly

Department of Animal and Poultry Industry, University of Delaware, Newark

ABSTRACT

The correlation between methoxyl, lignin, and crude fiber contents of forage and feces and the digestible dry matter of the forage has been determined with 36 observations on forage samples and 65 observations on fecal samples (forage, –.818, +.300, and –.578, respectively; feces, –.851, –.087, and –.839, respectively). In subsequent work reported, the lignin determination was discontinued because it was not promising. The crude fiber determination was also discontinued, because it appeared to be no better as an indicator than the methoxyl determination, and the latter offered the technical advantages of measuring a precise chemical entity, and the procedure is less empirical.

With a total of 66 forage and 98 fecal observations, correlation coefficients of –.724 and –.725, respectively, were obtained between methoxyl content and the digestible dry matter of the forage. The protein content of the feces was a less reliable indicator of digestible dry matter, whereas that of forage had no indicator value (correlation coefficients of .528 and –.218, respectively).


FOOTNOTES

1 Delaware Agricultural Experiment Station, Miscellaneous Paper No. 285.

2 Present address—Eastern Mennonite College, Harrisburg, Va.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1958 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.