JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 41 No. 6 769-775
© 1958 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lang, G. I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, W. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lang, G. I. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jordan, W. K.

Comparison of Standard Methods of Measuring Holding Time in H.T.S.T. Pasteurizers

G. I. A. Lang1 and W. K. Jordan

Department of Dairy Industry, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

ABSTRACT

Three tests for the determination of holding time were compared; namely, the nickel chloride—dimethylglyoxime chemical method, the sodium nitrite—Griess-Ilosvay chemical method, and the salt conductivity method. Tests were carried out, under field conditions, on five commercial plate-type, high-temperature, short-time pasteurizers, the capacities of which ranged from 3,935 to 16,525 lb. per hour. The size of holding tubes on these units was from 11/2- to 21/2-in. nominal size sanitary piping, whereas one of the units had a plate-type holder section.

The methods were compared under conditions as nearly identical as circumstances would permit. Results of tests, carried out in accordance with these methods, were compared on the basis of the same flow rate, with the same type of injection being used. The point of injection of the solution used as a tracer was the same in all tests in relation to the flow of liquid entering the holding section.

The results indicate that the sodium nitrite test was more sensitive as a method of determining holding time than either the nickel chloride test or the salt conductivity test. This was more apparent in high-capacity units, using larger-sized holding tubes, and in lower-capacity units with a low holding-tube efficiency. The nickel chloride test and the salt conductivity test were shown to be of comparable sensitivity on low- and medium-capacity units, but on higher-capacity units the nickel chloride test appeared more sensitive than the salt conductivity test.


FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: The West of Scotland Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr, Scotland.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1958 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.