JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 41 No. 5 651-661
© 1958 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hueter, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Doetsch, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hueter, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Doetsch, R. N.

Comparison of in Vivo and in Vitro Techniques in Ruminology Studies1

F. G. Hueter, R. J. Gibbons, J. C. Shaw and R. N. Doetsch

Departments of Dairy Husbandry and Microbiology, University of Maryland, College Park

ABSTRACT

This paper is concerned with the comparison of in vivo and in vitro rumen bacterial dissimilations of some carbohydrates, amino acids, and organic acids of metabolic importance. It was observed that succinate, DL-aspartate, glucose, and maltose were readily fermented by rumen microorganisms, and that volatile fatty acids (VFA) were produced. The amino acids DL-lysine, DL-alanine, and glycine were not degraded to an appreciable extent to VFA by rumen bacteria. In general, qualitative agreement between in vivo and in vitro washed cell suspension (WCS) experiments was obtained with DL-lysine, DL-alanine, and glycine, while the in vivo studies using DL-aspartate and succinate agreed with the WCS in vitro studies of Sirotnak et al. (17, 18). With the substrates glucose and maltose, in vitro WCS experiments were both variable and in disagreement with the in vivo studies. Thus, the WCS technique appears most useful for studying short one- or two-step reactions presumed to occur in the rumen. This technique loses significance when studying niultistep metabolic reactions and, in such cases, the results should be interpreted with caution until they are verified by in vivo experiments, or until further studies concerning the limitations of the WCS technique are available.


FOOTNOTES

1 Scientific Article No. A641, Contribution No. 2824 of the Maryland Agricultural Experiment Station.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1958 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.