JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 41 No. 1 176-181
© 1958 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lassiter, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lassiter, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Duncan, C. W.

Ground Corn Cobs as a Source of Roughage for Lactating Dairy Cows1

C. A. Lassiter, C. F. Huffman and C. W. Duncan

Departments of Dairy and Agricultural Chemistry Michigan State University, East Lansing

ABSTRACT

Two studies were conducted with milking cows to compare ground corn cobs with alfalfa hay for roughage, and a high protein (20.8 to 22.6%) grain mix was fed to supply Morrison's (9) minimum TDN standards, assuming that the corn cobs had the same TDN value as the alfalfa hay. In Trial I, corn cobs were substituted for hay at the rate of 8.0 and 16.0 lb. per day without affecting milk production, fat test, or body weight. An alfalfa-brome grass hay, which had a TDN value of 47.8%, was used for comparison.

In Trial II, corn cobs replaced alfalfa hay up to 60% of the total roughage intake without affecting milk production, and up to 80% of the total roughage without seriously affecting milk production. The TDN content of the alfalfa hay was 52.0 to 53.0%. When the cows were fed 0.4 lb. of hay and 2.1 lb. of corn cobs per 100 lb. of body weight, consumption of total roughage decreased 1.6 lb. per cow daily. Corn cobs appear to be equal to medium-quality alfalfa hay up to the limit of the cow's ability to consume them. Digestion trials were conducted in both studies, but no significant trends were noted.


FOOTNOTES

1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Article No. 2126.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1958 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.