JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 40 No. 7 752-758
© 1957 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blosser, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Putnam, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Blosser, T. H.

Cereal-Grain Screenings Produced in the Pacific Northwest as a Feed for Lactating Dairy Cows1, 2, 3,

P. A. Putnam4 and T. H. Blosser

Department of Dairy Science, State College of Washington, Pullman

ABSTRACT

Screenings are being used by dairymen and livestock feeders as a partial or a complete substitute for the concentrate ration. Screenings are used in grain-producing and surrounding regions because of their low cost.

There is good reason to question the use of screenings as a substitute for part or all of the concentrate ration because of: (a) their extreme variability in composition; (6) their frequently high crude fiber and ash content; (c) their frequently high content of weed-seeds, possible low nutritive value, and danger of weed propagation.

Dunsmore (3) fed various grades of wheat screenings to steers and dairy cattle. In these trials, recleaned elevator screenings proved to be equal to a good mixed meal for fattening steers. Recleaned elevator screenings proved valuable when composing one-third of the meal ration. Until the animals became accustomed to the change, however, screenings were unpalatable because of weed-seeds.

For lamb fattening, Linfield (4) found that a ration of lucerne and mixed grain or screenings, with or without beet pulp, was the most profitable of several rations fed.


FOOTNOTES

1 Scientific Paper No. 1536, Washington Agricultural Experiment Station, Pullman. Project 787.

2 These data were taken in part from a thesis presented by the senior author to the faculty of the State College of Washington, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree.

3 The mixed cereal-grain screenings used in this trial were furnished by the Washington Co-operative Farmers' Association.

4 Now at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1957 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.