JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 27 No. 1 53-55
© 1944 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Swope, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. C.
Right arrow Articles by Swope, W. D.

Final Report of the Sub-Committee on the Determination of the Percentage of Fat in Sweetened Condensed Milk and Evaporated Milk

W. C. Brown, E. O. Herreid, J. H. Erb and W. D. Swope

University of West Virginia
University of Vermont
Ohio State University
Chairman, Pennsylvania State College

ABSTRACT

The committee has made an attempt to find a satisfactory method for the determination of fat in sweetened condensed milk and evaporated milk where Mojonnier equipment is not available.

The standard method of procedure in conducting the Babcock test is unsuitable for testing dairy products containing added sugar on account of the carbonization of the sugar which makes the reading of the fat column difficult.

Accuracy, simplicity, low cost and the use of standard Babcock equipment were the principal factors considered.

Comparisons were made of a number of methods which have been used in determining the percentage of fat in dairy products, with the Mojonnier method as the standard. Some of the methods investigated were eliminated because the originators did not recommend them for testing sweetened condensed milk and evaporated milk. Others were eliminated because the results were not satisfactory to the committee.

It was found, in making a further investigation, that both the Pennsylvania and the Minnesota methods gave results which agreed closely with the Mojonnier method.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1944 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.