JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 21 No. 6 275-281
© 1938 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roland, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Trebler, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Roland, C. T.
Right arrow Articles by Trebler, H. A.

A Plant Study of Damaged and Defective Milk Bottles

C. T. Roland and H. A. Trebler

Research Laboratories, Sealtest, Inc., Baltimore, Md.

ABSTRACT

A study of the damaged and defective milk bottles and related data in two large bottling plants resulted in the following conclusions:

  1. Bottles were rejected because of impact shock breakage and damages, thermal shock cracks, etched surface, and manufacturing flaws.
  2. Spalls, chips, and impact breakage in general occurred most frequently around the lips and the bottom rims of bottle. Sharp edges on the bottles contributed materially to chipping and spalling. Thermal shock cracks occurred most frequently in the lip and neck region. A significant amount of thermal shock cracking occurred in the bottle washing operation.
  3. The rejection percentages were in the increasing order: pints,
    Figure 1
    pints, quarts and gills. There was some relation between low rejection and few "trips per bottle." Large percentages of wholesale distribution without bottle deposit were accompanied by few "trips per bottle".







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1938 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.