JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 17 No. 11 737-742
© 1934 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harris, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Shultz, E. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Harris, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Shultz, E. N.

Progress Report on Comparison of Lactation and Yearly Records

G. M. Harris, Jay L. Lush and E. N. Shultz

Iowa State College, Ames, Iowa

ABSTRACT

Conclusions: From the results of this study it may be concluded that the Cow Testing Association yearly record tends to repeat itself in succeeding years about as closely as the lactation record does. Therefore a general change to the lactation basis for selecting dairy cows, proving dairy sires, etc., will not lead to any material increase in accuracy. Such a change would be hard to justify if it entails any appreciable amount of additional expense or trouble.

Above all, one should never lose sight of the fact that the conditions under which the records were made are important and allowances for them should be made wherever possible. The individual owner can do this to some extent, but the man who has only the production records with no description of the conditions under which they were made can not even begin to make such allowances.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1934 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.