JDS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Dairy Science Vol. 10 No. 1 83-85
© 1927 by American Dairy Science Association ®
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Murray, J. A.

Dairy Notes

J. Alan Murray

University College, Reading, England

ABSTRACT

ADULTERATION OF MILK

In most of the books which treat of the subject, the formulae given for calculation of the percentages of added water and fat removed in cases of adulterated milk are as follows:
Figure 1
f and n are respectively the percentages of fat and non-fatty solids found, F and N the percentages known or assumed to have been originally present, w the percentage of added water and p the percentage of the fat removed.

The first of these two formulae is not exact; and should be:
Figure 2
In any case it fails entirely if the milk has been watered.The second is exact only if none of the fat has been removed. This is generally recognised and some of the books give other formulae to be used in special cases, i.e., when the milk has been both skimmed and watered.

These special formulae are not regarded with much favour by analysts. In some cases they are too complicated; in others they are obviously inaccurate.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1927 by the American Dairy Science Association ®.